— Maya Angelou
— (“The Gates of Hope” meditation by Victoria Safford) from “The Poetry of Creatures,” Public Radio program On Being, Krista Tippet with Prof. Ellen Davis (via growingupdad)
Prof. Davis: It’s interesting that none of the so-called prophetic books of the Bible, the books that actually have the names of prophets attached to them, like Jeremiah, Isaiah, Amos, all of those books bring us to despair if we take them seriously. If we apply them to our lives they, in a sense, bring us to our knees. But none of them ends without what they call in the book of Jeremiah “the book of consolation.” None of them ends without a picture of the people of God returning to a healthy relationship with God, and all of them have a picture of the land being fruitful and productive, in celebration you might say, of that restored relationship between God and humanity, God and Israel.
And as kind of a parallel to that, when I began working in this area and I saw how deep the problems were, I got more and more depressed. I noticed this happens with my students when we begin studying this. The first movement is into depression.
Ms. Tippett: Mm-hmm.
Prof. Davis: But then there begins to be a sort of brightening on the path, you might say, as we begin to see that there are other people seeing the same things, we’re seeing and working on these things.
Ms. Tippett: You know, you use phrases in your writing that are kind of countercultural. You know, you speak of “a tenacious but severely chastened hope” or “things that are encouraging and deeply sobering.” And maybe it is that kind of realism that we have to have about hope, how closely it can be mingled with our despair and yet survive.
Prof. Davis: Certainly there is a difference between hope and a foolish optimism. And in order to have hope, you have to see the depth and the dimensions of the problem.
"— “The Poetry of Creatures,” Public Radio program On Being, Krista Tippet with Prof. Ellen Davis (via growingupdad)
Martin: Oh, you want an example? Fine! Let’s say, uh, what if there was a comet hurtling towards the earth…
Frasier: Oh, for God’s sake!
Martin: And you were the only person who could save the earth, but the only way to do it is by lying under oath. Would you do it then?
Frasier: Who am I lying to, the comet?
Martin: Oh, just answer the question!
Frasier: All right, I suppose in certain extreme cases…
Martin: So, then you’d lie?
Frasier: To save mankind from a talking comet, yes!"
— Frasier, To Tell the Truth (the problem with hypotheticals)
— Tim Keller, via Relevant Magazine (via else-wheres)
(via symphosanna)
— Ardis Whitman (via julie911)
(via symphosanna)
— Stephanie Marshal
